Showing posts with label Zagreb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zagreb. Show all posts

Thursday, November 22, 2007

England all played out again

The Emperor has no clothes and it’s official.

For the first time within the walls of the awesome citadel that is the new Wembley Stadium, the English national team has come a cropper in a big way, and this time there can be no hiding from the naked truth.

Now let these sombre words ring out across our green and pleasant land: England are a mediocre football nation and it’s high time we accepted it.

One final appearance in 57 continuous years of international football competitions tells its own story and cannot by any logic justify the perennial Mount Everest of expectations heaped upon the Three Lions.

As the 3-2 victory over England by a competent yet not exceptional Croatian eleven on Wednesday proved once more, there is simply no case for believing we deserve a place at the high table of the world’s football nations, so please don’t try to make it.

After such a miserable and humiliating surrender, can anyone seriously believe we can win the 2010 World Cup? Will the patriotic punters be out in force again to waste their money, like they have for the last forty years since we won the World Cup at home?

That the English invented the sport and still sustain a 92-team professional league is utterly immaterial if the national team consistently fails to perform, yet year after year, an inferno of fan fervour is stoked up by London’s boorish tabloid media with no basis in reality.

But the media is only partly to blame for the unrealistic expectations and to a great extent is only a mirror of the national zeitgeist.

The obscenely ballooning waistline of the cash cow that is the FA Premier League is also only reinforcing an existing tunnel vision shared by millions throughout the home of football.

There is a foreign influx in our leagues and globalization all around us, but it clearly does not follow that a great domestic league can produce a world-class national team.

So who do we blame this time?

The usual suspects for the latest shambles are lining up and while they all shoulder a part of the blame, are mostly red herrings while the prime suspect is still at large.

Steve McClaren is not the main culprit and I take no pride in having predicted as soon as he was appointed that he would fail.

Although guiding your club to 15th place in the Premier League is not the best preparation for coaching your country, McClaren had served apprenticeships under Alex Ferguson and Sven-Goran Eriksson and there were no realistic alternatives for England last summer.

While some fans are slating McClaren for starting with 4-5-1 at home, without Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney his striking options were limited and when reinforcements did arrive in the shape of Darren Bent and Jermain Defoe, the much-needed punch up front was still lacking.

In fact, the catalyst for England’s comeback was the arrival of David Beckham, in perhaps his last national team appearance, after halftime, a player from Major League Soccer who provided an artistry and finesse with the ball otherwise lacking from his team on the night.

The English players’ superstar salaries are almost irrelevant too. Serie A pays huge wages but that never stopped Italy’s national team winning the World Cup impressively last summer. And English players certainly do not lack passion. If anything, they play with too much heart and not enough head, yet England critics routinely bemoan a lack of passion and self-belief as the reasons for falling short.

That there may be too many foreign players in England for the national team’s good is also an argument that looks shakier by the day. In fact, on the evidence of last night, no wonder Arsene Wenger shops overseas.

The dissections and post mortems on the corpse of England’s latest failure are everywhere, though few have realised the fatal disease is merely an inherited and myopic attitude that the English way is best.

Like Charybdis, the fearsome whirlpool of Greek mythology, our semi-permanent debate on the national team ends up going round in circles of self-delusion, our consistent demand for unrealistic success devouring all passing managers lured too close to the job.

This insular hara-kiri was evident off the field as well as on. Thousands of England fans pointedly ignored the Wembley announcer’s request to respect both national anthems by booing Croatia’s loudly, before revelling in taunting the traveling fans with several renditions of ‘You’re not singing anymore’, only to be confounded as supersub Mladen Petric speared a spectacular 25-yard winner with 13 minutes remaining.

‘Rule Britannia’ is still one of our favourite songs, but its boasting of global dominance had a particularly pathetic ring at Wembley last night, a specious self-aggrandizement amid the carnival of English obsolescence on the field.

Sheltering from the Wembley monsoon while the queues to the tube station still stretched down Bobby Moore Way a full hour after the final whistle, I got talking to some Croatian fans, who gave me some refreshing points of view on our particular malaise.

The heavens were downright miserable, but there was some blue-sky thinking to be found beneath the deluge.

“England has good players, but they don’t play as a team,” thought Branko from Dubrovnik.

“You’re right,” I said, “but we don’t know any different.” Contrary to some opinions aired this week, England can produce great talents.

I could reel off names such as Bobby Charlton, Tom Finney and Stanley Matthews, but from more recently, what about John Barnes, Paul Gascoigne, Gary Lineker and Chris Waddle from the 1980s and David Beckham, Steven Gerrard, Owen and Rooney from the ‘90s.

“Your style is twenty years behind the times,” offered Zlatko from Mostar. “You hit long high balls to the big forward, Crouch. We know that is what the English do. It is simple to play against.”

“Well Crouch did score tonight,” I offered in defence, but I broadly agreed with his analysis.

“Look at the Germans,” said Goran from near Split. “They work hard the whole time too, but they do it as a team.”

I then racked my brains for times in my life when England have played with great fluidity and got stuck on a handful of occasions: In the latter stages of Italia ’90, for the first half of a friendly against Mexico in 2001, against Italy in Rome in 1997 and most famously smashing the Netherlands 4-1 at Wembley in Euro ’96 and Germany 5-1 in Munich five years later.

Our national style still leans towards passionate and direct attacking – ‘droit au but’ –‘straight to goal’, as the motto of Marseille says. And we have to change this mindset, wholesale, from the grass roots up, if we want to challenge for international trophies.

One final in 57 years of FIFA and UEFA competition is surely proof there is a hairline fracture in the monolith of the Football Association, a lingering faultline that cannot and should not be attributed to any particular coach or set of players.

The one excuse I didn’t hear on the tortuous journey from the Wembley mega-arena back to my home in North London was perhaps the most obvious one: Croatia were just better than us.

“Wake up,” Croatia coach Slaven Bilic said succinctly post-match. “We’re simply a better team.”

They undoubtedly were the superior side, having defeated England home and away in the qualification campaign, yet I still heard a fan moaning that England had played badly and lost to ‘a shit team’. ‘Yeah, they are a shit team,’ echoed his equally dim friend.

Well, relativism aside, any team who tops a UEFA qualification group cannot by any sound reasoning be made of caca.

The Croats gave England a footballing lesson in both Zagreb and London in soaking up pressure, throwing bodies into attack or defense appropriately, counter-attacking and shooting from distance.

But what really stood out for me at Wembley was their outfield players’ superior technique.

The Croats’ creed is possession, like it is for all great football nations, while England still go for broke in the final third and try to hit that killer ball into the channels or lump it onto the head of that big lad in the box, too often finding their optimistic punts intercepted or overhit instead.

On the night, Shaun-Wright Phillips typified what is wrong with English football. Energetic and brimming with passion, the Chelsea winger charged goalward whenever he was given the ball, but too often his ardour burned out as he mishit a cross, collided with a defender or ran the ball out of play.

Time and again, England played without any telepathy when they managed to get the ball near the opponents’ box, while every Croatian tap, layoff or backheel seemed to be wired to an incoming teammate.

The Croats clearly knew how to counter-attack better than we did, sprinting upfield, stretching our retreating defence and hitting first-time passes to runners without hesitation. They built a shape-shifting, multi-dimensional game which defeated our rigid, one-dimensional structure with ease.

We might lazily lump all Eastern European football nations together as tough, former communist, crack army sides from chilly lands, but remember Croatia, like Romania, is essentially a Mediterranean country whose warm weather breeds skilful ballplayers.

Facing Italy across the Adriatic, Croatia has only been a country since 1991 and with a population of under five million, has in that short space of time, produced stars of the calibre of Zvonimir Boban, Alen Boksic, Robert Prosinecki and Davor Suker.

Yet however you compare the two countries, England should be a far better football nation than Croatia.

Once again, I fear we will skirt around the answer to our ills – a complete and radical overhaul of the coaching culture.

The intangibility of the problem and its equally nebulous solution just discourage us from addressing it properly, and so England stumble to under-achievement every time.

It almost seems a treasonable offense to the Anglo-Saxon virtues ingrained in our national game to tell our kids to keep the ball instead of to ‘get it in there!’, to think about their shape and position instead of to ‘get stuck in lad!’ and to bring others into attack instead of to ‘go on your own, son, have a pop!’ etc.

The continental method does seem anathema to a windy Sunday morning league game in Rotherham, but ask yourself who is the more successful soccer nation – Italy or England?

‘Look at Arsenal,’ Zlatko continued. ‘They have a great coach and play in a European style but are an English team’.

Treating football seriously from a young age also draws us into a political debate we would rather steer clear of, that of mass education’s historic lack of importance in England in general.

If we want well trained footballers, we need well educated players, who understand the professional commitment and the intellectual ability the game demands at the highest level.

‘What about Wayne Rooney?’ you holler. Nothing can compensate for raw talent like his, surely; only to a point. Imagine what Gascoigne could have done with the self-discipline of a Zinedine Zidane, or how Rooney could prosper with the spatial awareness of strikers like Dennis Bergkamp, Thierry Henry or Henrik Larsson.

On the train home, there was no anger, nor misery at England’s premature exit from Euro 2008, just a resigned mood, an unspoken acceptance that we have seen it all before.

I really felt that maybe for the first time, an accommodation of our ineptitude had begun to set in with the fans, a growing acceptance of the obvious mediocrity we have been dealing with for years.

Make no mistake. This umpteenth failure for England will not be the last, unless we do start again from the grass roots, bite the bullet and admit the FA’s manuals are mistaken in many ways and our coaching outdated.

Or, we can bury our heads in the sand once more, blame Steve McClaren or whoever underperformed last night and come 2010, summon up the blood to bellow from the rooftops our belief that England can win the World Cup, if only we the fans and they the players want it enough.

Unless there is a revolution, the future history of the England team writes itself.

All may not be lost however. As I traipsed down the many steps from Wembley’s upper tier, and some fans began to sing ‘Jose Mourinho’, I began to think that the foreign influx in our game could end up being the solution instead of the problem, whoever the next coach may be. The tide of the world game is all around us now, at home and abroad.

And what is for sure is that England’s national football culture, more than ever, is all played out.

(c) Sean O'Conor & Soccerphile

Saturday, September 16, 2006

Maksimir Stadium

England will face off against Croatia in their fourth Group E Euro 2008 qualifier in the 40,000 capacity Maksimir Stadium in Zagreb on October 11.

The stadium (known locally as Stadion u Maksimiru), is home to one of Croatia's top clubs, Dinamo Zagreb, and is
located in the north eastern part of Croatia's capital Zagreb about 3.5km
from the city center and across the street from Zagreb's Zoo. The stadium is part of the Svetice recreational and sports complex, to the south of Maksimir Park. The first stadium in the area was built as far back as 1912 and underwent re-construction from the 1940s - 60s. Maksimir Stadium was again updated for the Universiade Games (World Student Sport Games) between 1986 and 1987 and plans are in the making to expand the stadium yet again to a 60,000 capacity and add a retractable roof.

Maksimir Stadium
Maksimirska 128, 10000 Zagreb
Croatia
Tel: +385 1 232 32 34

Getting to Maksimir Stadium

Zagreb is well served for public transport by a tram network which links the main railway station and the city's main square, Trg Bana Jelačića.

The nearest station to the stadium is Bukovacka.

From Zagreb station (Glavni Kolodvor) take tram line #4 towards Dubec. From Trg Bana Jelačića Square, take either tram #11 or #12 running to Maksimir in the direction of Dubec or Draskovićeva. Tram #7 also goes to the stadium.

Journey time is around 20 minutes and costs 8 Croatian kuna (1.60 USD) if you buy your ticket on the street car or 6.50 kuna (1.30 USD) from one of the city's numerous newspaper kiosks. A one-day pass for the Zagreb tram is currently 18 kuna (3.10 USD).

Croatian league football matches in Croatia usually take place on Sundays, as in nearby Italy.

Hotels in Zagreb - Bookings

Premiership Betting

Football in Croatia

Panstadia

Football Supporters International

Copyright © Soccerphile

Tags

Tuesday, April 4, 2006

Soccer in European Capitals

Slovenian capital Ljubljana the only one without a team in the
top flight

Slovenska sramota - Ljubljana jedina bez prvoligaša

Jedini europski glavni grad koji nema nijednog nogometnog prvoligaša je - Ljubljana. I ne tako čudan podatak, s obzirom na tretman koji je nogomet imao u Sloveniji još u vrijeme postojanja Jugoslavije: nikakav!

Zadnji je ljubljanski klub u Si.Mobil Ligi bila Olimpija, koja je međutim zbog financijskih teškoća amaterizirana i poslana u četvrti rang natjecanja.

Istraživanje koje je proveo slovenski magazin Sportal pokazuje da Atena, Moskva i Tbilisi daju najviše klubova svojim nacionalnim prvim ligama, po sedam, dok je relativno najzastupljeniji armenski glavni grad Erevan, sa šest klubova od devet armenskih prvoligaša.

Zagreb daje tri prvoligaša, ako ubrojimo Inter iz Zaprešića, koji formalno nosi titulu posebnog grada, no koji u narodu uživa status predgrađa (otud i Interov nadimak "Diva iz predgrađa").

Pogledajmo sve klubove iz europskih glavnih gradova

Sedam klubova:
Grčka (16 klubova u 1. ligi) - Atena: Olympiacos, Panathinaikos, AEK, Atromitos, Egaleo, Ionikos, Kallithea
Gruzija (16) - Tbilisi: Dinamo, WIT, Ameri, Lokomotivi, Dinamo Sokhumi, Spektakl, Tbilisi
Rusija (16) - Moskva: CSKA, Moskva, Spartak, Saturn, Lokomotiv, Dinamo, Torpedo

Šest klubova:
Engleska (20) - London: Chelsea, Tottenham, Arsenal, West Ham United, Charlton Athletic, Fulham
Armenija (9) - Erevan: Ararat, Banants, Kilikia, Lernajin Artsah, Pjunik, Dinamo Zenit
Azerbejdžan (14) - Baku: Baku, Inter, Karabah, MOIK, Nefči, Olimpik
Srbija i Crna Gora (16) - Beograd: Crvena zvezda, Partizan, Voždovac, OFK Beograd, Rad, Obilić

Pet klubova:
Irska (12) Dublin: St. Patrick's, Shelbourne, Dublin City, University College Dublin, Bohemians
Mađarska (16) - Budimpešta: Ujpesti ZE, MTK, Honved, Ferencvaros, Vasas
Rumunjska (16) - Bukurešt: Steaua, Rapid, Dinamo, National 2000, Sportul Studentesc

Četiri kluba:
Bjelorusija (14) - Minsk: Dinamo, Lokomotiv, MTZ RIPO, Zvezda BGU
Bugarska (16) - Sofija: CSKA, Levski, Lokomotiv, Slavija
Cipar (14) - Nikozija: APOEL, Omonia, Akritas, Olympiakos
Island (10) - Reykjavik: Valur, Fylkir, Fram, Throttur
Makedonija (12) - Skopje: Rabotnički, Vardar, Makedonija, Cementarnica

Tri kluba:
Albanija (10) - Tirana: Dinamo, Partizani, Tirana
Andora (8) - Andorra la Vella: Lusitans, Principat, Ranger's
Bosna i Hercegovina (16) - Sarajevo: Sarajevo, Željezničar, Slavija
Estonija (10) - Talin: TVMK, Flora, Ajax Lasnamae
Hrvatska (12) - Zagreb: Dinamo, Zagreb
Litva (10) - Vilnius: Žalgiris, Vilnius, Vetra
Moldavija (8) - Kišinjev: Zimbru, Dacia, Politechnica
Portugal (18) - Lisabon: Sporting, Benfica, Belenenses
Sjeverna Irska (16) - Belfast: Linfield, Glentoran, Cliftonville
Španjolska (20) - Madrid: Real, Atletico, Getafe

Dva kluba:
Austrija (10) - Beč: Austria, Rapid
Belgija (18) - Bruxelles: Anderlecht, Molenbeek
Češka (16) - Praga: Slavija, Sparta
Farski otoci (10) - Torshavn: B36, HB
Italija (20) - Rim: Roma, Lazio
Latvija (8) - Riga: Riga, Skonto
Norveška (14) - Oslo: Lyn, Valerenga
Poljska (16) - Varšava: Legia, Polonia
Slovačka (10) - Bratislava: Artmedia Petržalka, Inter
Škotska (12) - Glasgow: Rangers, Celtic
Švedska (14) - Stockholm: Djurgardens, Hammarby
Ukrajina (16) - Kijev: Dynamo, Arsenal

Jedan klub:
Danska (12) - Kopenhagen: FC Kobenhavn
Finska (14) - Helsinki: HJK Helsinki
Francuska (20) - Pariz: PSG

Nula klubova:
Slovenija (10) - Ljubljana: nijedan

(Source: Sportal)

cheap hotels in Slovenia

fa cup / champions league soccer tickets

Thursday, November 24, 2005

European Leagues Review

Who's the best away team?

HNL: Naslovi se osvajaju u gostima

Dinamo drugi najbolji gost u Europi!

Sedmom pobjedom u gostima i ukupno 13. u 16 kola Dinamo je zadržao 11 bodova prednosti ispred drugoplasirane Rijeke. Sa sedam pobjeda (od čega šest uzastopnih) u osam gostovanja, Kužeova je momčad u vrhu Europe po broju gostujućih pobjeda. Ispred nje zasad je samo kijevski imenjak, koji je dobio svih osam utakmica izvan svog stadiona, a Dinamo dijeli drugo i treće mjesto s također ukrajinskim Šahtarom.
Kao domaćini, pred Modrima su pali Cibalia (0:4), Inter (0:6), Slaven (0:2), Zagreb (0:4), Međimurje (1:5), Rijeka (0:1) i Varteks (2:5), a jedini je pošteđen ostao Osijek (1:0.)

Prošlu je sezonu maksimirska momčad završila sa skromne tri pobjede na strani, čime je izjednačila svoj najlošiji gostujući učinak, onaj iz 1992. Najviše je gostujućih pobjeda Dinamo imao 1996/97 (13) te 2002/03 (12), dok je Hajduk najbolji učinak zabilježio 2003/04 (11).

Nevjerojatno, međutim, zvuči podatak da je Dinamo na matematičkoj sredini tekućeg prvenstva postigao ukupno onoliko pobjeda koliko i u cijelom prošlom prvenstvu - 13. Da bi paradoks bio još veći, od skromnih 13 prošlogodišnjih pobjeda, Dinamo je tri ostvario u Ligi za ostanak, dakle među slabijim suparnicima. Modri su, recimo i to, sada samo za tri pobjede "kraći" u odnosu na Hajdukov ukupan učinak od 16 pobjeda u cijeloj sezoni 2004/05.


Pobjede u gostima
Dosad je deset puta prvenstvo osvojio klub s najviše pobjeda u gostima, dok 1994., 1995., 1999. i 2002. uspjeh na strani nije donio i naslov prvaka.

U ovom pregledu donosimo broj pobjeda u odnosu na broj odigranih utakmica u gostima te konačni plasman momčadi s najviše pobjeda na tuđim terenima.

Sezona Klub Pobjede Plasman
u gostima

1991/92 Hajduk 8/11 (1.)
1992/93 Dinamo 9/15 (1.)
1993/94 Zagreb 10/17 (2.)
1994/95 Dinamo 7/15 (2.)
1995/96 Dinamo 6/16 (1.)
1996/97 Dinamo 13/15 (1.)
1997/98 Dinamo 8/15 (1.)
1998/99 Rijeka 10/16 (2.)
1999/00 Dinamo 10/16 (1.)
2000/01 Hajduk 8/16 (1.)
2001/02 Hajduk 10/15 (2.)
2002/03 Dinamo 12/16 (1.)
2003/04 Hajduk 11/15 (1.)
2004/05 Hajduk 6/16 (1.)
2005/06 Dinamo 7/8 (1.)


Najbolji europski "gosti"

Tablica donosi broj pobjeda i broj odigranih utakmica u gostima.

1. Dinamo Kijev 8/8
2-3. Dinamo Zagreb 7/8
Šahtar 7/8
4. Hearts 6/7
5-6. Lyon 6/8
Celtic 6/8
7. Žilina 6/9
8-11. Juventus 5/6
Charlton 5/6
Fenerbahce 5/6
Partizan 5/6
12-18. Bayern 5/7
Manchester Utd. 5/7
Feyenoord 5/7
Fehervar 5/7
C. Zvezda 5/7
Galatasaray 5/7
Gaziantepspor 5/7
19. Rijeka 5/8
20. Artmedia 5/9

Bet with Bet 365

World Soccer News

Soccer betting tips

Soccer Books & DVDs

Tags

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

European Leagues

Najbolje gol razlike u europskim ligama



Dinamo u europskom vrhu!



S omjerom od 22:2, zagrebački je Dinamo u ovom trenutku najbolji europski klub što se tiče razlike pogodaka, računajući sva bolja europska ligaška natjecanja, dok su u apsolutnom poretku ispred Dinama samo slovenske Domžale s fantastičnih 26:4 uz jednak broj odigranih utakmica (osam).



Domžale je na vodeće mjesto svrstala pobjeda nad Rudarom iz Velenja od 8:0, rezultat s kojim se ni ovogodišnji Dinamo ne može mjeriti. No, i momčad koju vodi Josip Kuže ima se s čime pohvaliti: gostujuće pobjede nad Interom (6:0), Cibalijom i Zagrebom (po 4:0) te uspjeh protiv Rijeke u Maksimiru (5:1) čine današnju Dinamovu generaciju najuspješnijom po gol razlici u povijesti 1. HNL, što se tiče prva dva mjeseca sezone.



U ostatku Europe, najjače "praši" nizozemski lider AZ Alkmaar, s +18, dok nije loš ni drugoplasirani u tom prvenstvu, Feyenoord, s +12. Vodeći škotski klub, Hearts, nakon sedam uzastopnih pobjeda ima izvrstan omjer golova od 20:4, dok se slovački lider Spartak iz Trnave diči omjerom od 18:3.



Uzmemo li u obzir snagu prvenstava, najbolje stoji Chelsea, koji vodi u Premiershipu s fantastičnih 12:0. Iz Liga petice, s Chelseajem se može nositi samo Bayern, sa svojih 14:3. Najbolju razliku pogodaka u Francuskoj nema vodeći Lyon (+6), već petoplasirani Lens (+8). Talijansko i španjolsko prvenstvo dogurali su tek do trećeg kola, pa nijedna momčad nema zapaženu razliku pogodaka (Juventus +6, Inter +5, Getafe +3).



Najbolje gol razlike 2005/06

(do 19.9.2005.)



1. Domžale 8 26:4 (+22)

2. Dinamo Zagreb 8 22:2 (+20)

3. AZ Alkmaar 5 21:3 (+18)

4. Hearts 7 20:4 (+16)

5. Spartak Trnava 9 18:3 (+15)

6. Dinamo Kijev 9 20:6 (+14)

7. Šahtar Donjeck 9 19:5 (+14)

8. Dinamo Bukurešt 6 17:4 (+13)

9. Anderlecht 6 18:6 (+12)

10. Feyenoord 5 15:3 (+12)

11. Chelsea 6 12:0 (+12)

12. CSKA Sofija 5 15:4 (+11)

13. Bayern 5 14:3 (+11)

14. Werder 5 16:6 (+10)

15. Galatasaray 6 16:6 (+10)

16. Olympiakos Pirej 3 10:0 (+10)



Opaska:

Brojevi na tablici označavaju broj odigranih utakmica, omjer golova i razliku golova. Nismo uzeli u obzir lige koje počinju u proljeće, zbog nesrazmjerno velikog broja odigranih utakmica.



(Sportske novosti)